<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Grammar Or Not To Grammar, That Is The Question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goddesscarlie.com/language/to-grammar-or-not-to-grammar-that-is-the-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goddesscarlie.com/language/to-grammar-or-not-to-grammar-that-is-the-question/</link>
	<description>Carlie journeys towards Japanese fluence via lots of procrastination, drama watching, and staring at Japanese boys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:17:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Discovering Mandarin</title>
		<link>http://www.goddesscarlie.com/language/to-grammar-or-not-to-grammar-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>Discovering Mandarin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goddesscarlie.com/?p=1446#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>I am in two minds about this.

Instinctivley I think learning basic grammar is correct, but then again immersion is true learning, because otherwise as said above you end up translating which is wrong.

I like Rosetta stones basic vocab because it is purely pictorial and introduces new things at a refreshing pace. However, I realise that it won&#039;t take me close to being fluent.

I think for me using a variety of methods is going to be best so
a) I don&#039;t get bored
b) I stimulate memory of all aspects of the language
c) I keep on reaffriming things I know in other areas through learing something new.

I think I will learn some grammar, but not let it hold me back from learning new characters, or just litening to the language being spoken.

I am looking to start using Anki this week, with Rosetta stone and some audio books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in two minds about this.</p>
<p>Instinctivley I think learning basic grammar is correct, but then again immersion is true learning, because otherwise as said above you end up translating which is wrong.</p>
<p>I like Rosetta stones basic vocab because it is purely pictorial and introduces new things at a refreshing pace. However, I realise that it won&#8217;t take me close to being fluent.</p>
<p>I think for me using a variety of methods is going to be best so<br />
a) I don&#8217;t get bored<br />
b) I stimulate memory of all aspects of the language<br />
c) I keep on reaffriming things I know in other areas through learing something new.</p>
<p>I think I will learn some grammar, but not let it hold me back from learning new characters, or just litening to the language being spoken.</p>
<p>I am looking to start using Anki this week, with Rosetta stone and some audio books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Know Nothing About Grammar&#8230; &#124; Spanish Only</title>
		<link>http://www.goddesscarlie.com/language/to-grammar-or-not-to-grammar-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>I Know Nothing About Grammar&#8230; &#124; Spanish Only</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goddesscarlie.com/?p=1446#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>[...] blogosphere about memorizing rules/grammar/structures/etc. (take these for example: 1, 2, 3, 4). The worst thing is: they all direct in a way that either promotes learning (read: cramming) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogosphere about memorizing rules/grammar/structures/etc. (take these for example: 1, 2, 3, 4). The worst thing is: they all direct in a way that either promotes learning (read: cramming) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M-Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.goddesscarlie.com/language/to-grammar-or-not-to-grammar-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>M-Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goddesscarlie.com/?p=1446#comment-673</guid>
		<description>simply put grammer are for some while others get by without it. More power to them I know I need some basics in grammar though or i will just be lost! And I guess with new vocab I learn it&#039;s good to know some form of grammar to go with it but I do agree not to spend ALL your time with it. Listening is key.. it helps you to speak more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>simply put grammer are for some while others get by without it. More power to them I know I need some basics in grammar though or i will just be lost! And I guess with new vocab I learn it&#8217;s good to know some form of grammar to go with it but I do agree not to spend ALL your time with it. Listening is key.. it helps you to speak more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoddessCarlie</title>
		<link>http://www.goddesscarlie.com/language/to-grammar-or-not-to-grammar-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>GoddessCarlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goddesscarlie.com/?p=1446#comment-590</guid>
		<description>As a child it took you probably two years to start saying anything, and perhaps five years before you were sort of speaking OK. Seven or eight to have some reading, and probably not til you were around 10 where you could read thick books. I don&#039;t want to wait that long! That knowledge you were building on nothing. Now as adults we have a solid foundation of language knowledge we can build upon. 

I don&#039;t think you think too much with Grammar, in my case. It allows me to quickly make connections between things where as, for me, without grammar, it would take me much longer to start producing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a child it took you probably two years to start saying anything, and perhaps five years before you were sort of speaking OK. Seven or eight to have some reading, and probably not til you were around 10 where you could read thick books. I don&#8217;t want to wait that long! That knowledge you were building on nothing. Now as adults we have a solid foundation of language knowledge we can build upon. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you think too much with Grammar, in my case. It allows me to quickly make connections between things where as, for me, without grammar, it would take me much longer to start producing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.goddesscarlie.com/language/to-grammar-or-not-to-grammar-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goddesscarlie.com/?p=1446#comment-585</guid>
		<description>Immersion isnt really a language learning method, its simply a method of language absorption. You cant &quot;immerse&quot; yourself if a language without actually being in that particular country, so it doesnt really count in a discussion about language learning methods.

Doing too much of anything is bad, but you need some grammar to give you a solid foundation, especially as an adult learner. You are not a baby anymore, and you cannot expect to absorp a language like a baby does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Immersion isnt really a language learning method, its simply a method of language absorption. You cant &#8220;immerse&#8221; yourself if a language without actually being in that particular country, so it doesnt really count in a discussion about language learning methods.</p>
<p>Doing too much of anything is bad, but you need some grammar to give you a solid foundation, especially as an adult learner. You are not a baby anymore, and you cannot expect to absorp a language like a baby does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramses</title>
		<link>http://www.goddesscarlie.com/language/to-grammar-or-not-to-grammar-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goddesscarlie.com/?p=1446#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, I studied grammar in the past but quit as soon as I began thinking about how we learn language as kids. Now, one could argue that we change as we grow older, but would we learn our first language with immersion if that wouldn&#039;t be one of the best ways to learn a language?

I firmly believe that studying too much grammar will leave you with anything but fluency, as you&#039;ll think too much before you start producing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, I studied grammar in the past but quit as soon as I began thinking about how we learn language as kids. Now, one could argue that we change as we grow older, but would we learn our first language with immersion if that wouldn&#8217;t be one of the best ways to learn a language?</p>
<p>I firmly believe that studying too much grammar will leave you with anything but fluency, as you&#8217;ll think too much before you start producing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeoffB</title>
		<link>http://www.goddesscarlie.com/language/to-grammar-or-not-to-grammar-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoffB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goddesscarlie.com/?p=1446#comment-570</guid>
		<description>Looking at the debates about Pimsleur vs. Rosetta Stone vs. Michel Thomas, it&#039;s important to remember that there&#039;s a lot of money at stake based on what emerges as the &quot;best&quot; product. I think there&#039;s a similar ego investment for a lot of the self-taught. It&#039;s hard, when you&#039;ve spent years figuring out what works for you, to have people tell you it&#039;s nonsense. More than that, it&#039;s silly. There are quite obviously people who have learned well using one method and other people who have learned well using a completely different method. So while some methods may be pretty bad for a lot of people, that doesn&#039;t mean that there&#039;s one best method. So if your learning is progressing, that&#039;s great. Don&#039;t change a thing! But if your learning slows down, you should start looking at other programs and at what people are talking about on the blogs and forums, not so you can find the right way, but so that you can find something that will be right for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the debates about Pimsleur vs. Rosetta Stone vs. Michel Thomas, it&#8217;s important to remember that there&#8217;s a lot of money at stake based on what emerges as the &#8220;best&#8221; product. I think there&#8217;s a similar ego investment for a lot of the self-taught. It&#8217;s hard, when you&#8217;ve spent years figuring out what works for you, to have people tell you it&#8217;s nonsense. More than that, it&#8217;s silly. There are quite obviously people who have learned well using one method and other people who have learned well using a completely different method. So while some methods may be pretty bad for a lot of people, that doesn&#8217;t mean that there&#8217;s one best method. So if your learning is progressing, that&#8217;s great. Don&#8217;t change a thing! But if your learning slows down, you should start looking at other programs and at what people are talking about on the blogs and forums, not so you can find the right way, but so that you can find something that will be right for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoddessCarlie</title>
		<link>http://www.goddesscarlie.com/language/to-grammar-or-not-to-grammar-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>GoddessCarlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goddesscarlie.com/?p=1446#comment-552</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the awesome comment and the follow up post! :) I really like your site. 

I think, to an extent, what we are learning in books/formulated courses is always going to sound a bit unnatural. People are always throwing things into speech that aren&#039;t going to be in text books, from &quot;um&quot; to pronouncing things &quot;wrong&quot; such as &quot;knife&quot; as &quot;ker-ni-fie&quot;. I think of text books etc as a foundation, then watch tv shows etc to see how in real life words are applied. Often I need some subs to actually put two and two together as well, as people mumble and speak faster than the text book counter parts. But slowly I will watch something, and suddenly get jolted back to relatity because I didn&#039;t understand something - and realise I had been watching and actually understanding for a couple of minutes. Now that is a satisfying feeling!

I look forward to living in Japan where I will have more oportunity to apply what I am learning, but for now I make due with what I have.

Thanks for your reply!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the awesome comment and the follow up post! <img src='http://www.goddesscarlie.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/11.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I really like your site. </p>
<p>I think, to an extent, what we are learning in books/formulated courses is always going to sound a bit unnatural. People are always throwing things into speech that aren&#8217;t going to be in text books, from &#8220;um&#8221; to pronouncing things &#8220;wrong&#8221; such as &#8220;knife&#8221; as &#8220;ker-ni-fie&#8221;. I think of text books etc as a foundation, then watch tv shows etc to see how in real life words are applied. Often I need some subs to actually put two and two together as well, as people mumble and speak faster than the text book counter parts. But slowly I will watch something, and suddenly get jolted back to relatity because I didn&#8217;t understand something &#8211; and realise I had been watching and actually understanding for a couple of minutes. Now that is a satisfying feeling!</p>
<p>I look forward to living in Japan where I will have more oportunity to apply what I am learning, but for now I make due with what I have.</p>
<p>Thanks for your reply!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoddessCarlie</title>
		<link>http://www.goddesscarlie.com/language/to-grammar-or-not-to-grammar-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>GoddessCarlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goddesscarlie.com/?p=1446#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Schools are hard because you some how have to teach a whole group of people the same stuff yet there are different learning styles. We did a lot of &quot;motivational/study methods&quot; classes in grade 12 at my highschool (to prepare for both those who were going out to get a job and those who were going to uni next) and I remember some basic tips such as engage all your senses. Some are stronger than others, so it is easier to learn with those methods, but others are obviously weaker and thus need more work.

I think if schools too used a similar approach.. i.e. teach things in all different kinds of ways and everyone should be able to get something out of it. Unfortunatly, perhaps that is too much time/effort, or something, but it is not the way things usually happen.

I was lucky going through school in that I learn well from reading something teachers have written on the board and then writing my own notes down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schools are hard because you some how have to teach a whole group of people the same stuff yet there are different learning styles. We did a lot of &#8220;motivational/study methods&#8221; classes in grade 12 at my highschool (to prepare for both those who were going out to get a job and those who were going to uni next) and I remember some basic tips such as engage all your senses. Some are stronger than others, so it is easier to learn with those methods, but others are obviously weaker and thus need more work.</p>
<p>I think if schools too used a similar approach.. i.e. teach things in all different kinds of ways and everyone should be able to get something out of it. Unfortunatly, perhaps that is too much time/effort, or something, but it is not the way things usually happen.</p>
<p>I was lucky going through school in that I learn well from reading something teachers have written on the board and then writing my own notes down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoddessCarlie</title>
		<link>http://www.goddesscarlie.com/language/to-grammar-or-not-to-grammar-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>GoddessCarlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goddesscarlie.com/?p=1446#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Exactly. I think grammar is a good base to build upon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. I think grammar is a good base to build upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
